Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss - Big Oil and Alt Fuels

Source Article: Oil Giants Loath to Follow Obama’s Green Lead | www.nytimes.com (article)

Implications:

1) World still hungry for Hydrocarbon-based energy

2) Electric Transportation will require new infrastructure

3) Plug-in electrics have technical and cost hurdles to clear before becoming competitive

4) Oilco Capital better spent on immediate consumption needs

5) Liquid Bio (Renewable) hold better immediate promise

Analysis:

The Major Oil Companies apparent reluctance to invest in alternative energy plans to supplant the current dominant product class - hydrocarbon based fuels, is easy to understand.

Look at the ethanol business in the US. With much hype and great hopes going forward, most of the ethanol producers are in bankruptcy, victims of the volatility in Oil prices and the global economic downturn. Valero(NYSE:VLO) purchasing VeraSun's refining capacity after VeraSun filed for bankruptcy, announced a couple of weeks ago, is endemic of this situation.

Valero(NYSE:VLO) has announced they will use this capacity for their own blending needs. Instead of a potential large customer, they are now a producer with captive demand. It lead me to say in a prior article about green energy investments; "Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss".

Valero(NYSE:VLO) will be one of the largest, and for sure the most economically healthy, ethanol producer in the US as of the completion of the sale. AND they got the assets at a large discount vs the development costs.

When it makes economic sense to invest in alternative and renewable energy, the Oilcos will do that. There just isn't a business case for it yet.
BP, ExxonMobil(NYSE:XOM), Total, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) all are doing research, but that's it for now.

While people don't understand why, the answer is simple; the best use of capital for an oil company is to produce more oil at this point in time. The world economy was built for and still thirsts for oil.

Plug-in electrics are a ways from being more than a "Special use" replacement for a conventional vehicle, whether gasoline fueled or some sort of hybrid and alt-fuel powered iteration of it. Electrical vehicles that aren't producing power onboard, like a pure plug-in, will need a whole new transportation "Sub-infrastructure" designed for it.

Liquid renewables seem to have the most development potential for fast adoption and economic viability, but the ethanol wipe-out for the corn-based producers shows there needs to be new technologies and feedstock found to make it a viable long-term model.

Until there are real government measures put in place to protect renewable fuel investments and resources, the Oil companies are better served to watch the "experiments" that are taking place begin to become commercially viable before jumping in.

This may not seem a very "Green" argument to make, but until there's "green (money)" in going green, don't expect more than research from the big Oilcos.

Green Energy Investment is Risky without Government Backup

Source Article
Green energy plans in disarray as wind farm giant slashes investment | business.timesonline.co.uk (article)

Implications:
1) Alternative Energy is not able to compete with "Cheap" oil at this time.

2) Wind and Solar may be able to compete before Biofuels for Transport

3) There is no way to Project Competing Energy (Hydrocarbon) Costs reliably for the length of investment needed for Alternative Energy Infrastructure.

4) Government programs guaranteeing "Floor" pricing for alternatives and renewables only way to attract investment capital

Analysis:
The "Green Energy" movement - Renewables, Biofuels and oil substitutes like ethanol, are subject to energy market price volatility as a whole, and compete for capital with other energy projects.

The rapid spike and decline in oil prices over the last 18 months has shown that there is very little elasticity of demand for hydrocarbon-based energy. The infrastructure the world has invested in for the past 100+ years is based on the availability of hydrocarbon fuels (Coal, Natural gas, and Crude Oil derived refined products) as the primary energy source.

As long as the emerging "Green" energy sources cannot be guaranteed a "floor" price where government will make up the difference between production and market costs while the industry matures and is able to become competitive in the global energy free market, there will be very little incentive for private(NYSE:BBY) investment in these technologies and the infrastructures needed to support them.

The financial collapse of corn-based ethanol producers in the US is a prime example of why alternative and Bio energy will be a hazardous proposition for investors until a way to protect them from the bottom of oil's price swings can be initiated.

Relatively inexpensive oil will always be a threat to Green Energy business plans; they are building against a competitor that has years of investment and operating experience, in addition to loads of capital, with which to compete.

State oil firms pump based on how much cash they need to bring in to support the government that owns them, market lows are of little consequence to their plans. While the State-owned Oilcos love the high prices, the odds of a group of state-owned firms volume discipline being maintained at the expense of a bankrupt government is virtually nil.

The Super Major Multinational privately owned firms have been very selective about competing wit their core hydrocarbons businesses, they understand the economics better than anyone else.

Until some large governments embrace distributed-generation electrical production and the smart grid needed to make that model work, as a national security priority, the odds of significant amounts of electricity being produced by "Green" means is very slim indeed.

Biofuels for transport face an even tougher uphill fight without help to get the industry off the ground

Super Major Multinational Oil Firms Can Continue to Invest for the Future

Source Article: Shell Plans Major Investments in 2009, Tags Dividend Growth at $10 billion | www.rigzone.com (article)

Implications:
1) Recent big profits give them strong balance sheets
2) Can Source Capital inexpensively right now
3) World Still Hungry for Hydrocarbons at any Price
4) OilCo's can control bio and alternative fuel assets at discount now.

Analysis:
Shell's announcement of capital expenditures remaining at high levels should come as no surprise. All the Supermajor Multinational Oil firms have plenty of cash and strong balance sheets, access to capital at very low rates, and an inelastic demand vs price in hydrocarbon based energy. ExxonMobil(NYSE:XOM) and Total are doing the same.

While prices are down right now, the historic run-up last year showed just how inelastic the core demand for oil, natural gas and refined products really is. While alternative fuels and conservation measures like hybrid and electric cars will reduce demand in the long run, those developments are still way out on the investment horizon.

The oil companies can also exert influence and a degree of control on the future of biofuels right now, and Valero's(NYSE:VLO) announced purchase of bankrupt VeraSun's ethanol production assets this week shows. BP, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) and ExxonMobil are all featuring alternative technologies in their advertising right now.

The collapse of oil prices created an opportunity to purchase overleveraged bio and alternative fuel assets at a discount, as the market price the VeraSun's and the like used to justify investment fell apart.

So the future for the Oil companies isn't just about crude, but the alternatives and substitutes being developed to supplant the world demand for crude. The Supermajors are expert and efficient conduits for product and capital, as they diversify into the other types of energy alternatives, that isn't going to change.